I've been chewing on the 11/3/05 study "who killed Jesus" and finally nailed down why it's been bothering me so much (I was struggling to articulate something along this line in small group but couldn't figure out how to say it). This was the study where we learned that we all killed Jesus because He died for our sins. Please comment - I'm curious to see what you all think:
I’m not disagreeing that there is some truth to the fact that we may have “killed” Jesus.
"Kill" literally means to deprive of life. Under that definition, while we didn’t literally take his life, it is probably not incorrect to say we had a role in depriving Him of life since he wouldn’t have died but for our sins.
The problem lies with the motive behind this strong word choice. "Kill" is a strong word, synonymous with SLAY, MURDER, ASSASSINATE, DISPATCH and EXECUTE. These are violently negative words. When someone tells you that you killed Jesus, it is obviously meant to invoke feelings of guilt and sadness, among other things.
Yet, the gospel is about the Good news, not the bad news. the fact that Jesus died for our sins is not something that should cause anyone to be despondent or guilt-ridden, but rather filled with gratefulness and joy. To say that we killed Him would be to turn the good news into the “bad news,” totally disregarding the message of grace: e.g., (1) God died out of love, not necessarily obligation; (2) Jesus’ gift of salvation was freely given, not something we that we took by force, (3) Jesus chose to die for us, as opposed to was forced to die for us,. (4) the responsibility for the plan of Jesus’ redemptive work - and ultimately the all glory and credit for it– should be all to God, not to us.
The challenge last week was to think in all things, even the minutia of daily life, what would Jesus do. My thought is, blame shifting is not probably something Jesus would be doing. moreover, this message of guilt may also cause others to stumble. Just my thoughts - I hope I don't get flammed for this posting!